yes this is a breaking change, as well as some other changes we introduced. However this is not API that is usually used, and the impact of this change is very minor.
Anyway, since Ayende is the maintainer of the project, I'll leave the decision as to what version should it be to him. 2010/3/9 John Simons <[email protected]>: > I also agree with Markus, I think the version should be v3.0. > It is a major change and should be treated as such. > Also, from what you said, you moved certain APIs from Core to Windsor, > right? If this is right then this is a breaking change. > > Cheers > John > > On Mar 10, 6:29 am, Markus Zywitza <[email protected]> wrote: >> I thought these were the trunk version numbers for releases to come in >> the future with other changes, not one that will be released in the >> near future with bug fixes only. >> >> -Markus >> >> 2010/3/9 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: >> >> > well, IMO v3.0 should be something major, and other than the merge/split >> > there aren't many major changes really. >> >> > On 3/9/2010 7:20 PM, Markus Zywitza wrote: >> >> >> When the profile changed, ain't that a reason for a major version >> >> update? 3.0 for both of them? >> >> >> -Markus >> >> >> 2010/3/9 Jonathon Rossi<[email protected]>: >> >> >>> +1 >> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Roelof Blom<[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>>> +1 >> >> >>>> 2010/3/9 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]> >> >> >>>>> Well yes - but the profile of Core changed. >> >> >>>>> Now parts of it that were Windsor/MK specific were moved to Windsor >> >>>>> assembly. >> >> >>>>> also DynamicProxy is now major part of it. >> >>>>> As such since last version of DP was 2.2 I think it is reasonable to >> >>>>> up it to 2.5 since >> >>>>> what most people would be interested in is DP anyway. >> >> >>>>> I don't think there are many people actually interested solely in Core >> >>>>> and it would be awkward >> >>>>> to have a post v2.2 DynamicProxy in assembly with version 1.3 >> >> >>>>> Krzysztof >> >> >>>>> On 9 Mar, 10:10, Roelof Blom<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>>> It states 1.3 for Core on the project roadmap. >> >> >>>>>> 2010/3/9 Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]> >> >> >>>>>>> Yes, 2.5 is what I was thinking about. >> >>>>>>> I would also update Core (with now DP included) to v 2.5 as well. >> >> >>>>>>> Krzysztof >> >> >>>>>>> On 9 Mar, 10:05, Roelof Blom<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>> Hi, >> >> >>>>>>>> To avoid confusion now MK and Windsor have merged we should update >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> version number of the trunk. The projects page ( >> >> >>>>>>>http://www.castleproject.org/castle/projects.html) does not state yet >> >>>>>>> what >> >> >>>>>>>> it's going to be. >> >>>>>>>> How about 2.5? >> >> >>>>>>>> -- Roelof. >> >> >>>>>>>> 2010/3/5 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >> >> >>>>>>>>> BTW, >> >> >>>>>>>>> if no one objects, I will approach merging the assemblies during >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> weekend: >> >>>>>>>>> - Castle.DynamicProxy will be merged into Castle.Core >> >>>>>>>>> - Castle.MicroKernel will be merged into Castle.Windsor >> >>>>>>>>> - parts of Castle.Core that are targetted at IoC will be moved to >> >>>>>>>>> Castle.Windsor >> >> >>>>>>>>> Krzysztof >> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>>>>>> Groups >> >>>>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >> >>>>>>> [email protected] >> >>>>>>> . >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> >>>>>>> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> >> >>>>>>> . >> >>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>>>> Groups >> >>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to >> >>>>> [email protected]. >> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>>>> [email protected]. >> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>>> Groups >> >>>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >>>> To post to this group, send email to >> >>>> [email protected]. >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>>> [email protected]. >> >>>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >>> -- >> >>> Jono >> >> >>> -- >> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> >>> To post to this group, send email to >> >>> [email protected]. >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> [email protected]. >> >>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
