Hi,

I am sorry but I don't have time nor interest to create a working Mono
setup.

-- Roelof.

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:19 AM, John Simons <[email protected]>wrote:

> I've investigated building Core with mono for windows(latest version)
> and it didn't work :(
> I'm not too sure if it has to do with the msbuild customisations or
> something else, Roelof can you have a look at it?
>
> Cheers
> John
>
> On Apr 13, 3:47 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > OK, I'll investigate the possibility and switch Core and Windsor to CP
> >
> > On 2010-04-13 05:39, Simon wrote:
> >
> > > RE client profile
> > > First some backgroundhttp://
> msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc656912.aspx
> > > OK this is my understanding of the "client profile" versions is that
> > > if you can build against the "client profile" you should.
> > > The reason being is that is it works against the "client profile" it
> > > will work against the full version
> > > This is echoed by the accepted answer here
> > >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15694/is-the-net-client-profile-wo.
> ..
> >
> > > One point to note is that Rhino mocks seems to use things not included
> > > in the client profile so your unit test projects will need to target
> > > the full version. Not a big issue since you dont deploy these.
> >
> > > On Apr 12, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >> Just to make a (more or less) comprehensive list of runtimes we
> > >> *could* support:
> >
> > >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (full)
> > >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (client profile)
> >
> > >> .NET 4 (full)
> > >> .NET 4 (client profile)
> > >> .NET 4 (web profile) //IIRC I saw this option in VS10beta2
> >
> > >> SL 3.0
> > >> SL 4.0
> >
> > >> Mono 2.6 +
> >
> > >> CF and SL-Wp7 are out due to lack of lots of crucial API. We could
> > >> produce a crippled version (no dynamic proxy) but that's massive
> > >> effort.
> >
> > >> On 12 Kwi, 02:25, James Curran<[email protected]>  wrote:
> >
> > >>> Um... There are different CPUs involved.  No Desktop Windows
> > >>> executable works on Mobile Windows.
> >
> > >>> Truth,
> > >>>      James
> >
> > >>> 2010/4/11 John Simons<[email protected]>:
> >
> > >>>> You have to be fu?$ing joking!
> > >>>> Another version of Silverlight, that is all we need! Can I get my
> own
> > >>>> version too!
> >
> > >>>> Bad MS bad.....
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to