Hi Rafael,

Which project did u try?

> Tried to build with msbuild, but have to hand edit the settings/config
> files to add another path to try to find peverify.exe inside the
> tests, as in Windows XP (yes I'm still tied to XP and VS 2005) we
> don't have the "(x86)" variants of the system environment variables.
Can we get a patch for this?

Cheers
John

On Apr 14, 7:33 am, Rafael Teixeira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Follow-up:
>
> I've downloaded the sources from github (my TortoiseGIT/mSysGit
> install is still broken probably in the ssh part of it).
>
> Tried to build with msbuild, but have to hand edit the settings/config
> files to add another path to try to find peverify.exe inside the
> tests, as in Windows XP (yes I'm still tied to XP and VS 2005) we
> don't have the "(x86)" variants of the system environment variables.
> After that fix it built easily and passed all tests.
>
> Installed latest released Mono for windows version 2.6.3.
>
> After tweaking the buildscripts/build.cmd to try out if xbuild exists
> and use it if it does, the build failed while referencing adodb,
> because of case-sensitivity issues while xbuild tries to resolve the
> reference.
>
> New bug on xbuild posted on Mono's 
> bugzilla:https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596364
>
> Next I'll try to build only xbuild from trunk and tweak it to make it
> work if possible posting patches for review upstream.
>
> Fun,
>
> Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira
> ---------------------------------------
> "To be creative means to be in love with life. You can be creative
> only if you love life enough that you want to enhance its beauty, you
> want to bring a little more music to it, a little more poetry to it, a
> little more dance to it."
> Osho
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Rafael Teixeira <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'll give it a try.
>
> > Fun,
>
> > Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira
> > ---------------------------------------
> > "To be creative means to be in love with life. You can be creative
> > only if you love life enough that you want to enhance its beauty, you
> > want to bring a little more music to it, a little more poetry to it, a
> > little more dance to it."
> > Osho
>
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:19 AM, John Simons <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> I've investigated building Core with mono for windows(latest version)
> >> and it didn't work :(
> >> I'm not too sure if it has to do with the msbuild customisations or
> >> something else, Roelof can you have a look at it?
>
> >> Cheers
> >> John
>
> >> On Apr 13, 3:47 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> OK, I'll investigate the possibility and switch Core and Windsor to CP
>
> >>> On 2010-04-13 05:39, Simon wrote:
>
> >>> > RE client profile
> >>> > First some 
> >>> > backgroundhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc656912.aspx
> >>> > OK this is my understanding of the "client profile" versions is that
> >>> > if you can build against the "client profile" you should.
> >>> > The reason being is that is it works against the "client profile" it
> >>> > will work against the full version
> >>> > This is echoed by the accepted answer here
> >>> >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15694/is-the-net-client-profile-wo...
>
> >>> > One point to note is that Rhino mocks seems to use things not included
> >>> > in the client profile so your unit test projects will need to target
> >>> > the full version. Not a big issue since you dont deploy these.
>
> >>> > On Apr 12, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
> >>> >> Just to make a (more or less) comprehensive list of runtimes we
> >>> >> *could* support:
>
> >>> >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (full)
> >>> >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (client profile)
>
> >>> >> .NET 4 (full)
> >>> >> .NET 4 (client profile)
> >>> >> .NET 4 (web profile) //IIRC I saw this option in VS10beta2
>
> >>> >> SL 3.0
> >>> >> SL 4.0
>
> >>> >> Mono 2.6 +
>
> >>> >> CF and SL-Wp7 are out due to lack of lots of crucial API. We could
> >>> >> produce a crippled version (no dynamic proxy) but that's massive
> >>> >> effort.
>
> >>> >> On 12 Kwi, 02:25, James Curran<[email protected]>  wrote:
>
> >>> >>> Um... There are different CPUs involved.  No Desktop Windows
> >>> >>> executable works on Mobile Windows.
>
> >>> >>> Truth,
> >>> >>>      James
>
> >>> >>> 2010/4/11 John Simons<[email protected]>:
>
> >>> >>>> You have to be fu?$ing joking!
> >>> >>>> Another version of Silverlight, that is all we need! Can I get my own
> >>> >>>> version too!
>
> >>> >>>> Bad MS bad.....
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to