I'll give it a try. Fun,
Rafael "Monoman" Teixeira --------------------------------------- "To be creative means to be in love with life. You can be creative only if you love life enough that you want to enhance its beauty, you want to bring a little more music to it, a little more poetry to it, a little more dance to it." Osho On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:19 AM, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > I've investigated building Core with mono for windows(latest version) > and it didn't work :( > I'm not too sure if it has to do with the msbuild customisations or > something else, Roelof can you have a look at it? > > Cheers > John > > On Apr 13, 3:47 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > wrote: >> OK, I'll investigate the possibility and switch Core and Windsor to CP >> >> On 2010-04-13 05:39, Simon wrote: >> >> > RE client profile >> > First some backgroundhttp://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc656912.aspx >> > OK this is my understanding of the "client profile" versions is that >> > if you can build against the "client profile" you should. >> > The reason being is that is it works against the "client profile" it >> > will work against the full version >> > This is echoed by the accepted answer here >> >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15694/is-the-net-client-profile-wo... >> >> > One point to note is that Rhino mocks seems to use things not included >> > in the client profile so your unit test projects will need to target >> > the full version. Not a big issue since you dont deploy these. >> >> > On Apr 12, 5:46 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2)<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Just to make a (more or less) comprehensive list of runtimes we >> >> *could* support: >> >> >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (full) >> >> .NET 3.5 sp1 (client profile) >> >> >> .NET 4 (full) >> >> .NET 4 (client profile) >> >> .NET 4 (web profile) //IIRC I saw this option in VS10beta2 >> >> >> SL 3.0 >> >> SL 4.0 >> >> >> Mono 2.6 + >> >> >> CF and SL-Wp7 are out due to lack of lots of crucial API. We could >> >> produce a crippled version (no dynamic proxy) but that's massive >> >> effort. >> >> >> On 12 Kwi, 02:25, James Curran<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Um... There are different CPUs involved. No Desktop Windows >> >>> executable works on Mobile Windows. >> >> >>> Truth, >> >>> James >> >> >>> 2010/4/11 John Simons<[email protected]>: >> >> >>>> You have to be fu?$ing joking! >> >>>> Another version of Silverlight, that is all we need! Can I get my own >> >>>> version too! >> >> >>>> Bad MS bad..... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
