+1

2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>

> No it won't.
>
> I want to keep the project together, not merge the binaries.
>
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 11/07/2010 2:45 AM, Henry Conceição wrote:
>
>> It you'll make the tx service windsor dependent, it isn't?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Henry Conceição
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>>> If no one has any objections I'm +1 :)
>>>
>>> Henrik, can you also update the solution to vs2010 and add .NET 4 build
>>> and
>>> .NET 4 Client Profile build?
>>> You can take a look at build scripts from Core and Windsor or ping Roelof
>>> if
>>> you need help with that :)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>> On 10/07/2010 11:43 PM, Henrik Feldt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I like the idea. I have suggested it before ;).
>>>>
>>>> Would you like me to merge them then?
>>>>
>>>> Henrik
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Krzysztof Koźmic [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: den 10 juli 2010 11:01
>>>> To: Castle Project Devel
>>>> Cc: Henrik Feldt
>>>> Subject: Merging ATM Facility and Transaction services into a single
>>>> project
>>>>
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to help Tuna get the NHibernate Facility going and for that I
>>>> need to upgrade all other dependencies it has, to Windsor 2.5 beta,
>>>> including ATM Facility.
>>>> According to the very useful diagram Jono did
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_11696/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_2.png
>>>> there's ATM Facility depending on it, NHFacility depending on both, and
>>>> ARFacility. (I don't count db4o facility which IIRC we shelved to the
>>>> attic, although given how NoSQL stuff is getting popular we might want
>>>> to get it back one day)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway - I was thinking that to limit the overhead and moving parts we
>>>> should merge the two into a single project, similar to how Windsor and
>>>> Logging Facility are kept together.
>>>> That means that they would be a separate assemblies/csproj but would
>>>> live in a single solution and repository.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts? Objections? I'm specifically interested in Henrik's opinion as
>>>> the leader of the project...
>>>>
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> .
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to