I think a lot of users are after the facility for v2.1





________________________________
From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sun, 11 July, 2010 10:38:54 AM
Subject: Re: Merging ATM Facility and Transaction services into a single  
project

We might do both if Tuna wants, but if Windsor 2.5 is less than a
month away... we might want to target it instead.

Tuna - what's your plan?

IIRC the trunk of the facility uses Windsor 2.0 anyway

2010/7/11 John Simons <[email protected]>:
> Does this mean we will not have a release of nhibermate facility against
> v2.1?
>
> Cheers John
> On 11/07/2010, at 4:43, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> 2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>>
>> No it won't.
>>
>> I want to keep the project together, not merge the binaries.
>>
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2010 2:45 AM, Henry Conceição wrote:
>>>
>>> It you'll make the tx service windsor dependent, it isn't?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Henry Conceição
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If no one has any objections I'm +1 :)
>>>>
>>>> Henrik, can you also update the solution to vs2010 and add .NET 4 build
>>>> and
>>>> .NET 4 Client Profile build?
>>>> You can take a look at build scripts from Core and Windsor or ping
>>>> Roelof if
>>>> you need help with that :)
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>> On 10/07/2010 11:43 PM, Henrik Feldt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I like the idea. I have suggested it before ;).
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you like me to merge them then?
>>>>>
>>>>> Henrik
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Krzysztof Koźmic [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: den 10 juli 2010 11:01
>>>>> To: Castle Project Devel
>>>>> Cc: Henrik Feldt
>>>>> Subject: Merging ATM Facility and Transaction services into a single
>>>>> project
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to help Tuna get the NHibernate Facility going and for that
>>>>> I
>>>>> need to upgrade all other dependencies it has, to Windsor 2.5 beta,
>>>>> including ATM Facility.
>>>>> According to the very useful diagram Jono did
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_11696/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_2.png
>>>>>g
>>>>> there's ATM Facility depending on it, NHFacility depending on both, and
>>>>> ARFacility. (I don't count db4o facility which IIRC we shelved to the
>>>>> attic, although given how NoSQL stuff is getting popular we might want
>>>>> to get it back one day)
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway - I was thinking that to limit the overhead and moving parts we
>>>>> should merge the two into a single project, similar to how Windsor and
>>>>> Logging Facility are kept together.
>>>>> That means that they would be a separate assemblies/csproj but would
>>>>> live in a single solution and repository.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts? Objections? I'm specifically interested in Henrik's opinion
>>>>> as
>>>>> the leader of the project...
>>>>>
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.


      

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to