Does this mean we will not have a release of nhibermate facility against v2.1?
Cheers John On 11/07/2010, at 4:43, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > 2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > No it won't. > > I want to keep the project together, not merge the binaries. > > Krzysztof > > > > On 11/07/2010 2:45 AM, Henry Conceição wrote: > It you'll make the tx service windsor dependent, it isn't? > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > 2010/7/10 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>: > > If no one has any objections I'm +1 :) > > Henrik, can you also update the solution to vs2010 and add .NET 4 build and > .NET 4 Client Profile build? > You can take a look at build scripts from Core and Windsor or ping Roelof if > you need help with that :) > > cheers, > Krzysztof > > On 10/07/2010 11:43 PM, Henrik Feldt wrote: > > Hello, > > I like the idea. I have suggested it before ;). > > Would you like me to merge them then? > > Henrik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Koźmic [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: den 10 juli 2010 11:01 > To: Castle Project Devel > Cc: Henrik Feldt > Subject: Merging ATM Facility and Transaction services into a single > project > > Hey, > > I'm trying to help Tuna get the NHibernate Facility going and for that I > need to upgrade all other dependencies it has, to Windsor 2.5 beta, > including ATM Facility. > According to the very useful diagram Jono did > > http://jonorossi.com/blog/images/jonorossi_com/blog/WindowsLiveWriter/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_11696/CastleProjectReleaseDependencies_2.png > there's ATM Facility depending on it, NHFacility depending on both, and > ARFacility. (I don't count db4o facility which IIRC we shelved to the > attic, although given how NoSQL stuff is getting popular we might want > to get it back one day) > > Anyway - I was thinking that to limit the overhead and moving parts we > should merge the two into a single project, similar to how Windsor and > Logging Facility are kept together. > That means that they would be a separate assemblies/csproj but would > live in a single solution and repository. > > Thoughts? Objections? I'm specifically interested in Henrik's opinion as > the leader of the project... > > Krzysztof > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
