This may come across as complaining, but I'm really just trying to address Henry's "it seems that people isn't accessing the inner pages of stw" comment from my personal perspective.
ScrewTurn Wiki, IMHO, has horrible default navigation. If I go to: http://stw.castleproject.org/ And look at the left navigation panel, I don't see a link for ActiveRecord (or anything useful really). In fact, visually scanning the landing page, it's hard to find the ActiveRecord link. I think it's not very inviting to users to drill down. I blame this completely on ScrewTurn Wiki and it's the main reason I won't recommend that product even though I know it is one of the better .NET Wikis. The Castle project is the first attempt I've seen to workaround STW's navigation issues that has had any amount of success (if I work at it, I can find what I want eventually). For comparison, if I go to this page: http://www.castleproject.org/ The projects link at the top seems like the place to find ActiveRecord and I am rewarded for clicking on it (assuming I don't bother to scroll down on the first landing page). Moving on... I find this page: http://www.castleproject.org/activerecord/documentation/trunk/index.html Much easier to deal with than this one: http://stw.castleproject.org/Active%20Record.MainPage.ashx Although the graphical design of the former helps, I think the formatting and collection of links could be somewhat replicated in STW without involving a designer (time and effort not withstanding). Honestly, as a documentation user, I avoid the STW site if possible even though I know the content is more likely to be accurate / up to date, because I find it unpleasant (primarily due to navigation and incompleteness of the move). I'm very appreciative of the effort that has gone into the STW site to date. That said, not enough work has gone into it yet that I will use it *first*. One other thing related to the STW site: I'm hesitant to put links to http://stw.castleproject.org/ on my blog, etc. as I know that URL will eventually change. I figure the http://www.castleproject.org/ URLs are safer to link to even though I don't really have any evidence to support that belief. While you would probably rather I link to the latest documentation, I'm instead intentionally choosing to link to what I believe is a more future-proof URL. -Michael Maddox http://www.Capprime.com/About.htm 2010/8/31 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: > No, I'm not. The stw has some link(s) to using. Also there are > bookmarks, blog posts, etc. Even after the link remotion of the using > and the switch to stw, using has almost twice more visitors than stw. > > The api site is almost dead, we practically don't receive visitors > there. So it isn't a big deal. > > We should only remove the current project main pages after we fix the > wiki layout, imho. > > But what concerns me the most, is that it seems that people isn't > accessing the inner pages of stw. I don't know the exact reason: maybe > they googled the wrong result, maybe they couldn't find what they > want, maybe they found it clumsy and left. Check the reports: > > https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B32splxWlkuqNTdhOWViMmUtYTBjZi00Y2ZhLWJkZGItYTkxYzMwN2U1ZWE2&sort=name&layout=list&num=50 > https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B32splxWlkuqMTJjOTgwYWUtZjlkZC00NDQ1LWFiZTgtZWU3N2M4ZjQ3ZWJm&sort=name&layout=list&num=50 > > > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
