Have they changed enough to be concerned about putting them in core? I am fine with an aggregated assembly if preference is not in Core.
On Sep 22, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Henry Conceição wrote: > And how about create a new project to aggregate those? Less assemblies > to maintain/release and we don't pollute the top projects. > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > 2010/9/22 Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>: >> I don't think they should be moved into MR. They are very useful by >> themselves and having to pull in MR just to get them would be extreme. I'd >> rather see them in Core although I am sure that is not popular consensus. >> On Sep 22, 2010, at 5:07 AM, John Simons wrote: >> >> If the consensus is to move Binder and/or Pagination into MR, I'm going to >> need some help with this because I have no idea how to move them with >> history. >> >> Cheers >> John >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wed, 22 September, 2010 7:56:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Projects release saga >> >> On 22/09/2010 7:49 PM, John Simons wrote: >>> Actually I've just re-read your question "how bringing some facilities >>> to Windsor's repository will affect it negatively?" >>> and I don't see any negative affects as long as the release of the >>> facilities is still separate. >> Cool, glad we agree :) >>> In MR I'm planning to have 3 release packages: >>> - The core MVC framework (this will include Validation + Binder + >>> Pagination + Core) >>> - The AR extension (this includes AR + its dependencies that are not >>> already included in main package) >>> - The Windsor extension (this includes Windsor + its dependencies that >>> are not already included in main package) >> sounds good. >>> BTW, there was a discussion a while ago about merging binder into MR >>> (http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/ >>> thread/432e826d2b94a27c/3ae1e1b117a0cfed), are we still good to do >>> this? >>> Also in the same discussion we talked about moving Pagination into MR, >>> and there were 2 people opposed, is this still a no go? >> No opinion for pagination, +1 for Binder. >> >> cheers, >> Krzysztof >>> Cheers >>> John >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group >> at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email >> to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group >> at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
