I am totally biased towards JTA. I think it's simple and very elegant.
And I've stated why people rely on readonly transactions, so there's a
benefit out there that you may disagree or consider low value/useless,
but then we're discussing opinions..

I still can't see your point on the implications of doing so. What are
the bad implications of having this support?


2010/10/7 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>:
> :)
>
> I think you're biased by the jta exposure.
>
> If you don't want a commit or a rollback, don't open a freaking
> transaction. Why you want to add the tx overhead to some context if
> you don't want the 2pc?


-- 
Cheers,
hammett
http://hammett.castleproject.org/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to