Yep.. 2010/10/6 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: > You said: "the data read shouldnt change within the boundaries of the > transaction, and thus remain consistent." By tx boundaries you meant > the db only? > > Cheers, > Henry Conceição > > > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:46 AM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Pardon me, but I dont see a problem with that.. perhaps you should >> explain what would be the adverse affect of this behavior? >> >> 2010/10/6 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: >>> But the changes will be visible outside the tx boundaries. they just >>> don't are persisted on the end of the tx. >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Castle Project Development List" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >> >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > >
-- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
