You said: "the data read shouldnt change within the boundaries of the transaction, and thus remain consistent." By tx boundaries you meant the db only?
Cheers, Henry Conceição On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:46 AM, hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > Pardon me, but I dont see a problem with that.. perhaps you should > explain what would be the adverse affect of this behavior? > > 2010/10/6 Henry Conceição <[email protected]>: >> But the changes will be visible outside the tx boundaries. they just >> don't are persisted on the end of the tx. > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
