In my opinion, since there are breaking changes, I would think moving
to a "2.6" release would be a better idea.  It's a bit more clear to
consumers that this is a big change.  2.5.x releases should be for bug
fixes and possibly minor new features.

My 2 cents...

---
Patrick Steele
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele



2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>:
> Ok, I need some more feedback on this.
>
> We have quite a few issues fixed for 2.5.2
> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/Changes.txt
> (at least two more pending so it's almost 15 in Windsor, plus a few in
> Core).
>
> We also have four breaking changes:
> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt
> As such I'm torn apart between making it seamless to update and making it
> explicit that this is a updated version as compared to 2.5.1
> so what do you guys/gals think? Should we just update the file version
> number, or update complete version number?
>
>
> On 18/10/2010 8:08 PM, Johannes Gustafsson wrote:
>
> Just a question regarding version numbering. If 2.5.2 is just a bugfix
> release, wouldn't it be better to keep the version at 2.5.1 or at least just
> update the file version and not assembly version?
> When 2.5.1 was released I had to recompile all my dependencies, (NHibernate,
> NServicebus and some other stuff) which is a real pain if it's just a bugfix
> release and no breaking changes.
> Kind regards,
> Johannes
> 2010/10/15 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>>
>>  OpenWrap handles versioning. NuPack is just a fancy download tool
>>
>> On 15/10/2010 1:04 PM, John Simons wrote:
>>>
>>> How does openwrap fixes this problem?
>>> And how about Nupack?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 15, 1:55 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We would need open wrap for this.
>>>>
>>>> sent from my HTC Desire
>>>>
>>>> On 15/10/2010 12:52 PM, "John Simons"<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But even if you do that you still have the problem u mentioned above:
>>>>
>>>> "Problem is not too many people download betas, so we likely wouldn't
>>>> catch that anyway."
>>>> which btw I agree 100%.
>>>>
>>>> Which makes me think, What is the point of releasing alpha, beta, rc,
>>>> if the users are not going to try them anyway?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the solution is to have continuous releases, doesn't Ayende do
>>>> that for NHProf, and Wordpress
>>>> (seehttp://toni.org/2010/05/19/in-praise-of-continuous-deployment-the-wor...
>>>> )
>>>> But that would require us to sort out our release procedures, as
>>>> you've pointed out on another thread :)
>>>>
>>>> Anyway just my 2 cents!
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 15, 8:35 am, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   I agree about one thing though - pushing out "alpha" releases much
>>>>> sooner for next release, pr...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2010/10/13 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> since there were some issues discovered in Windsor 2.5.1 (see issue
>>>>
>>>> tracker)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Castle Project Developmen...
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to