But your email said there's breaking changes: "We also have four breaking changes: http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt"
??? --- Patrick Steele http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele 2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>: > But this is bug fixes - solely > > On 26/10/2010 10:29 PM, Patrick Steele wrote: >> >> In my opinion, since there are breaking changes, I would think moving >> to a "2.6" release would be a better idea. It's a bit more clear to >> consumers that this is a big change. 2.5.x releases should be for bug >> fixes and possibly minor new features. >> >> My 2 cents... >> >> --- >> Patrick Steele >> http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele >> >> >> >> 2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>: >>> >>> Ok, I need some more feedback on this. >>> >>> We have quite a few issues fixed for 2.5.2 >>> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/Changes.txt >>> (at least two more pending so it's almost 15 in Windsor, plus a few in >>> Core). >>> >>> We also have four breaking changes: >>> >>> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt >>> As such I'm torn apart between making it seamless to update and making it >>> explicit that this is a updated version as compared to 2.5.1 >>> so what do you guys/gals think? Should we just update the file version >>> number, or update complete version number? >>> >>> >>> On 18/10/2010 8:08 PM, Johannes Gustafsson wrote: >>> >>> Just a question regarding version numbering. If 2.5.2 is just a bugfix >>> release, wouldn't it be better to keep the version at 2.5.1 or at least >>> just >>> update the file version and not assembly version? >>> When 2.5.1 was released I had to recompile all my dependencies, >>> (NHibernate, >>> NServicebus and some other stuff) which is a real pain if it's just a >>> bugfix >>> release and no breaking changes. >>> Kind regards, >>> Johannes >>> 2010/10/15 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >>>> >>>> OpenWrap handles versioning. NuPack is just a fancy download tool >>>> >>>> On 15/10/2010 1:04 PM, John Simons wrote: >>>>> >>>>> How does openwrap fixes this problem? >>>>> And how about Nupack? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 15, 1:55 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We would need open wrap for this. >>>>>> >>>>>> sent from my HTC Desire >>>>>> >>>>>> On 15/10/2010 12:52 PM, "John Simons"<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But even if you do that you still have the problem u mentioned above: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Problem is not too many people download betas, so we likely wouldn't >>>>>> catch that anyway." >>>>>> which btw I agree 100%. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which makes me think, What is the point of releasing alpha, beta, rc, >>>>>> if the users are not going to try them anyway? >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe the solution is to have continuous releases, doesn't Ayende do >>>>>> that for NHProf, and Wordpress >>>>>> >>>>>> (seehttp://toni.org/2010/05/19/in-praise-of-continuous-deployment-the-wor... >>>>>> ) >>>>>> But that would require us to sort out our release procedures, as >>>>>> you've pointed out on another thread :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway just my 2 cents! >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>>> On Oct 15, 8:35 am, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree about one thing though - pushing out "alpha" releases much >>>>>>> sooner for next release, pr... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2010/10/13 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> since there were some issues discovered in Windsor 2.5.1 (see issue >>>>>> >>>>>> tracker) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> so... >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups >>>>>> "Castle Project Developmen... >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups >>>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Castle Project Development List" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. >>> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
