But your email said there's breaking changes:

"We also have four breaking changes:
http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt";

???

---
Patrick Steele
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele



2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>:
> But this is bug fixes - solely
>
> On 26/10/2010 10:29 PM, Patrick Steele wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, since there are breaking changes, I would think moving
>> to a "2.6" release would be a better idea.  It's a bit more clear to
>> consumers that this is a big change.  2.5.x releases should be for bug
>> fixes and possibly minor new features.
>>
>> My 2 cents...
>>
>> ---
>> Patrick Steele
>> http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Ok, I need some more feedback on this.
>>>
>>> We have quite a few issues fixed for 2.5.2
>>> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/Changes.txt
>>> (at least two more pending so it's almost 15 in Windsor, plus a few in
>>> Core).
>>>
>>> We also have four breaking changes:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt
>>> As such I'm torn apart between making it seamless to update and making it
>>> explicit that this is a updated version as compared to 2.5.1
>>> so what do you guys/gals think? Should we just update the file version
>>> number, or update complete version number?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/10/2010 8:08 PM, Johannes Gustafsson wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a question regarding version numbering. If 2.5.2 is just a bugfix
>>> release, wouldn't it be better to keep the version at 2.5.1 or at least
>>> just
>>> update the file version and not assembly version?
>>> When 2.5.1 was released I had to recompile all my dependencies,
>>> (NHibernate,
>>> NServicebus and some other stuff) which is a real pain if it's just a
>>> bugfix
>>> release and no breaking changes.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Johannes
>>> 2010/10/15 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>  OpenWrap handles versioning. NuPack is just a fancy download tool
>>>>
>>>> On 15/10/2010 1:04 PM, John Simons wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> How does openwrap fixes this problem?
>>>>> And how about Nupack?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 15, 1:55 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would need open wrap for this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sent from my HTC Desire
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15/10/2010 12:52 PM, "John Simons"<[email protected]>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But even if you do that you still have the problem u mentioned above:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Problem is not too many people download betas, so we likely wouldn't
>>>>>> catch that anyway."
>>>>>> which btw I agree 100%.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which makes me think, What is the point of releasing alpha, beta, rc,
>>>>>> if the users are not going to try them anyway?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe the solution is to have continuous releases, doesn't Ayende do
>>>>>> that for NHProf, and Wordpress
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (seehttp://toni.org/2010/05/19/in-praise-of-continuous-deployment-the-wor...
>>>>>> )
>>>>>> But that would require us to sort out our release procedures, as
>>>>>> you've pointed out on another thread :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway just my 2 cents!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 15, 8:35 am, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   I agree about one thing though - pushing out "alpha" releases much
>>>>>>> sooner for next release, pr...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2010/10/13 Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>> since there were some issues discovered in Windsor 2.5.1 (see issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tracker)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>> "Castle Project Developmen...
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups
>>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Castle Project Development List" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Development List" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.

Reply via email to