Making it a seamless upgrade for most users is my preference, so I'd rather keep the same assembly version.
2010/10/26 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > Correct. Those were required to fix the issues. They are only going to > affect small fraction of the userbase methins and are not enough to justify > jump to 2.6. > > For 2.6 I would expect new features, and there are none. > > On 26/10/2010 10:35 PM, Patrick Steele wrote:But your email said there's > breaking changes: > > "We also have four breaking changes: >> >> http://github.com/castleproject/Castle.Windsor/blob/master/BreakingChanges.txt >> " >> >> ??? >> >> --- >> Patrick Steele >> http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<castle-project-devel%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
