Craig,

I found my stupid mistake :)
I need to load the xml first,
then do AddComponent...


Krzysztof


Craig Neuwirt wrote:
> Sounds nice.  I'll have to take a look
>
> 2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>     I am reading it via a facility and setting the appropriate things
>     on the configuration.
>     It means that I get a NICE config syntax, which is very admin friendly
>
>     2009/9/23 Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>         Hey Ayende,
>
>           Are you doing something different for your Rhino Service Bus?
>
>         craig
>
>         2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>             Take a look at how I am doing things for the Rhino Service
>             Bus.
>             And take a look here:
>             
> http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/12/31/didja-know-merging-windsor-configuration-with-automatic-registration.aspx
>
>             2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]
>             <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>
>                 My goal is to have the following:
>
>                 - register all the components in the code
>                 - externalize some of configuration options (like
>                 addresses and ports,)
>                 to external config file that a non-programming admin
>                 would edit.
>                 - be able to specify defaults for these options in
>                 code, and override
>                 these from the config if present
>
>                 The major point is to have just the minimal necessary
>                 amount of stuff
>                 put in the config file, to keep it clean, minimal and
>                 as readable as
>                 possible -  something like: http://gist.github.com/191862
>
>                 Now, Henry pointed me to Configuration.FromXmlFile
>                 method, but it seems
>                 to be working with the full blown windsor config files
>                 only, which I
>                 want to avoid, if only to make sure admin can't screw
>                 my component
>                 registration.
>
>                 Do we have some way of doing this baked in? If no,
>                 would you see it
>                 beneficial to have that in the framework?
>
>                 Krzysztof
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to