So, the correct form is the following??
IWindsorContainer container = new WindsorContainer()
.Install(Configuration.FromXmlFile("Config.admin"))
.AddComponent<IMyComponent, MyComponent>("foo");
2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>:
> Craig,
>
> I found my stupid mistake :)
> I need to load the xml first,
> then do AddComponent...
>
>
> Krzysztof
>
>
> Craig Neuwirt wrote:
>
> Sounds nice. I'll have to take a look
>
> 2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
>>
>> I am reading it via a facility and setting the appropriate things on the
>> configuration.
>> It means that I get a NICE config syntax, which is very admin friendly
>>
>> 2009/9/23 Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Hey Ayende,
>>> Are you doing something different for your Rhino Service Bus?
>>> craig
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at how I am doing things for the Rhino Service Bus.
>>>> And take a look here:
>>>>
>>>> http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/12/31/didja-know-merging-windsor-configuration-with-automatic-registration.aspx
>>>>
>>>> 2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> My goal is to have the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> - register all the components in the code
>>>>> - externalize some of configuration options (like addresses and ports,)
>>>>> to external config file that a non-programming admin would edit.
>>>>> - be able to specify defaults for these options in code, and override
>>>>> these from the config if present
>>>>>
>>>>> The major point is to have just the minimal necessary amount of stuff
>>>>> put in the config file, to keep it clean, minimal and as readable as
>>>>> possible - something like: http://gist.github.com/191862
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, Henry pointed me to Configuration.FromXmlFile method, but it seems
>>>>> to be working with the full blown windsor config files only, which I
>>>>> want to avoid, if only to make sure admin can't screw my component
>>>>> registration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do we have some way of doing this baked in? If no, would you see it
>>>>> beneficial to have that in the framework?
>>>>>
>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--
Truth,
James
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
