Right. and it has support for defines which improve readability and basic
conditionals

2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>

>  You mean ConfigurationInstaller ?
>
> I don't think so - after quick check it looks like it works only for the
> standard structure.
>
> Krzysztof
>
>
> Craig Neuwirt wrote:
>
> So are you gonna be able to use the standard xml configuration parsing?
>
> 2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>
>>  Say,
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
>> <configuration>
>>   <components>
>>     <component id="foo">
>>       <parameters>
>>         <name>Krzysztof</name>
>>       </parameters>
>>     </component>
>>   </components>
>> </configuration>
>>
>>  vs
>>
>>  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
>> <configuration>
>>      <foo name="Krzysztof" />
>> </configuration>
>>
>> Craig Neuwirt wrote:
>>
>> How much baggage is there as is?
>>
>> 2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]>
>>
>>> That's right.
>>>
>>> I guess I'm gonna play with creating a facility for this to have the
>>> minimal syntax baggage possible.
>>>
>>> James Curran wrote:
>>>
>>> So, the correct form is the following??
>>>
>>>             IWindsorContainer container = new WindsorContainer()
>>>                 .Install(Configuration.FromXmlFile("Config.admin"))
>>>                 .AddComponent<IMyComponent, MyComponent>("foo");
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> 
>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>>  Craig,
>>>
>>> I found my stupid mistake :)
>>> I need to load the xml first,
>>> then do AddComponent...
>>>
>>>
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>> Craig Neuwirt wrote:
>>>
>>> Sounds nice.  I'll have to take a look
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  I am reading it via a facility and setting the appropriate things on the
>>> configuration.
>>> It means that I get a NICE config syntax, which is very admin friendly
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  Hey Ayende,
>>>   Are you doing something different for your Rhino Service Bus?
>>> craig
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  Take a look at how I am doing things for the Rhino Service Bus.
>>> And take a look here:
>>> http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/12/31/didja-know-merging-windsor-configuration-with-automatic-registration.aspx
>>>
>>> 2009/9/23 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>  My goal is to have the following:
>>>
>>> - register all the components in the code
>>> - externalize some of configuration options (like addresses and ports,)
>>> to external config file that a non-programming admin would edit.
>>> - be able to specify defaults for these options in code, and override
>>> these from the config if present
>>>
>>> The major point is to have just the minimal necessary amount of stuff
>>> put in the config file, to keep it clean, minimal and as readable as
>>> possible -  something like: http://gist.github.com/191862
>>>
>>> Now, Henry pointed me to Configuration.FromXmlFile method, but it seems
>>> to be working with the full blown windsor config files only, which I
>>> want to avoid, if only to make sure admin can't screw my component
>>> registration.
>>>
>>> Do we have some way of doing this baked in? If no, would you see it
>>> beneficial to have that in the framework?
>>>
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to