Cool.
I just hacked up a temporary perl script to get around the empty elements and to
fix the second problem (by getting rid of the '_' and capitalising the <field
name= entry).
Now the third problem: I now have problems with collections (mapper expects a
Collection return but the actual generated method has the signature "public
T_CollectionConstantEntry[] getValue()"). I'm not sure if perl hacks are going
to get me over this one...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: The method getValueList in class
au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_CollectionConstantValue accepting/returning
object of type interface java.util.Collection was not found
at
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createFieldDesc(MappingLoader.java:719)
at
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLMappingLoader.createFieldDesc(XMLMappingLoader.java:260)org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException:
Nested error: org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: The method
getValueList in class au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_CollectionConstantValue
accepting/returning object of type interface java.util.Collection was not found
at
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createFieldDescs(MappingLoader.java:519)
at
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createDescriptor(MappingLoader.java:343)
at
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLMappingLoader.createDescriptor(XMLMappingLoader.java:157)
at
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.loadMapping(MappingLoader.java:212)
at org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping.getResolver(Mapping.java:278)
at org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping.getResolver(Mapping.java:234)
at org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.setMapping(Unmarshaller.java:224)
at org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.<init>(Unmarshaller.java:158)
at
au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.engine.TestMarshalMapping.main(TestMarshalMapping.java:74)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sleep well (when I saw your response I thought "great, he's awake", but then
read the last line of your email ;-)
Cheers,
Norval
|--------+----------------------->
| | Keith Visco |
| | <kvisco@intal|
| | io.com> |
| | |
| | 21/02/2002 |
| | 08:01 PM |
| | Please |
| | respond to |
| | castor-dev |
| | |
|--------+----------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Norval Hope/ISD/VWA) |
| Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Overriding |
| Generated Classes |
>--------------------------------------------------------|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Howdy Keith,
>
> Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately I'd already hacked my schema and sample
> fragments to have prefixes, but I've now moved over to the type-centric
method.
> I've now got some other problems:
> - the mapping tool generates the following empty elements which the
mapping
> schema doesn't like
> <include></include>
> <container></container>
> <key-generator></key-generator>
I fixed that one yesterday...CollectionFieldHandler had some bugs...once
fixed the
empty elements no longer appear...
Out of curiosity how come you are using a mapping file and not using the
generated class descriptors?
As for the below error...I'll have a look a mapping tool tomorrow...I
need to get some sleep.
Thanks,
--Keith
> - once the above errors have been hacked out the generated mapping
results
> in the following messages at unmarshal time:
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.engine.TestMarshalMapping test/resources
>
> org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: Nested error:
> org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: The method get_resultType in class
> au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_UnaryOperator accepting/returning object of
> type class au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_SimpleType was not found
>
> org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: The method get_resultType in class
> au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_UnaryOperator accepting/returning object of
> type class au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.castor_gen.T_SimpleType was not found
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createFieldDesc(MappingLoader.java:719)
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLMappingLoader.createFieldDesc(XMLMappingLoader.java:260)
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createFieldDescs(MappingLoader.java:519)
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.createDescriptor(MappingLoader.java:343)
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.xml.XMLMappingLoader.createDescriptor(XMLMappingLoader.java:157)
>
> at
>
org.exolab.castor.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.loadMapping(MappingLoader.java:212)
>
> at org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping.getResolver(Mapping.java:278)
>
> at org.exolab.castor.mapping.Mapping.getResolver(Mapping.java:234)
>
> at org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.setMapping(Unmarshaller.java:224)
>
> at org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.<init>(Unmarshaller.java:158)
>
> at
>
au.gov.vic.vwa.rules.engine.TestMarshalMapping.main(TestMarshalMapping.java:74)
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> so its like the _fieldName mentioned in the *Descriptor.java is being
used
> and "get" is just stuck on the front.
>
> It needs to remove the '_' and bi-capitalise to get the actual method
generated
> by the SourceGenerator: "getResultType()".
>
> Is there a different ClassDescriptorResolverImpl I'm supposed to use or
> something, I sort of expected that the SourceGenerator and MappingTool would
be
> compatible...
>
> Thanks,
> Norval
>
> |--------+----------------------->
> | | Keith Visco |
> | | <kvisco@intal|
> | | io.com> |
> | | |
> | | 21/02/2002 |
> | | 10:43 AM |
> | | Please |
> | | respond to |
> | | castor-dev |
> | | |
> |--------+----------------------->
> >--------------------------------------------------------|
> | |
> | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | cc: (bcc: Norval Hope/ISD/VWA) |
> | Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Overriding |
> | Generated Classes |
> >--------------------------------------------------------|
>
> Hi Norval,
>
> My patch was for anonymous simpletype generation it doesn't handle
> elements...so in your case there is still an issue when generating
> classes for elements with the same name. We still need to find a
> suitable approach for that...perhaps the appending parent names is the
> solution...or using inner classes. I believe however that this only
> affects the source generator when using the element-centric source
> generation. I think if you try the type centric approach you won't have
> this problem.
>
> In castorbuilder.properties, change
> org.exolab.castor.builder.javaclassmapping to use "type" instead of
> "element"...also uncomment it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Keith
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Hi Keith/Anyone interested,
> >
> > I proposed:
> >
> > > 2. The SourceGenerator would use naming conventions in generated Java
> > > files to avoid
> > > name collisions (to generate source from my schema I've had to
> > > artificially add
> > > prefixes to each element name to avoid clashes, e.g. the element
> > > "Type" gets reused
> > > in five different contexts, so I've had to make a CV_Type
"Constant
> > > Value Type"
> > > etc.
> >
> > Keith Visco said:
> >
> > Have you tried the CVS version. It contains some additional support for
> > this. Please see my previous post:
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05235.html
> >
> > To demonstate the problem I used the following schema and test XML fragment
> > against the latest CVS version (I presume I don't need a tag or anything?).
I
> > can tell when there has been a clash immediately as my Ant run freezes
> > (ConsoleDialog issue I've discussed previously, but I realise others are
> working
> > on the Ant support and now I know about it this behaviour doesn't concern
me)
> so
> > I use the "-f" argument to the SourceGenerator to force output. Then when I
> run
> > a test program to unmarshal nameclash.xml I get the output included at the
end
> > of this post.
> >
> > nameclash.xsd:
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> >
> > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
> >
> > <!-- =======================================================================
> -->
> > <xsd:annotation>
> > <xsd:documentation xml:lang="en" >
> >
> > @author: Norval Hope
> > @version: $Id: artwork.xsd,v 1.3 2002/01/24 12:54:41 norv1 Exp $
> >
> > Demonstrate name clashes in Java classes generated by Castor
SourceGenerator
> >
> > </xsd:documentation>
> > </xsd:annotation>
> > <!-- =======================================================================
> -->
> >
> > <xsd:complexType name="T_Key1">
> > <xsd:sequence>
> > <xsd:element name="Part1" type="xsd:string"/>
> > <xsd:element name="Part2" type="xsd:string"/>
> > </xsd:sequence>
> > </xsd:complexType>
> >
> > <xsd:complexType name="T_Key2">
> > <xsd:sequence>
> > <xsd:element name="Part" type="xsd:string"/>
> > </xsd:sequence>
> > </xsd:complexType>
> >
> > <xsd:complexType name="T_Context1">
> > <xsd:sequence>
> > <xsd:element name="PrimaryKey" type="T_Key1"/>
> > </xsd:sequence>
> > </xsd:complexType>
> >
> > <xsd:complexType name="T_Context2">
> > <xsd:sequence>
> > <xsd:element name="PrimaryKey" type="T_Key2"/>
> > </xsd:sequence>
> > </xsd:complexType>
> >
> > <xsd:complexType name="T_Both">
> > <xsd:sequence>
> > <xsd:element name="Ctx1" type="T_Context1"/>
> > <xsd:element name="Ctx2" type="T_Context2"/>
> > </xsd:sequence>
> > </xsd:complexType>
> >
> > <xsd:element name="Top" type="T_Both"/>
> >
> > </xsd:schema>
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > nameclash.xml:
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> >
> > <!--
> >
> > @author: Norval Hope
> > @version: $Id: example1.xml,v 1.3 2002/01/24 12:54:41 norv1 Exp $
> >
> > @@What is a neater way of defining the schema to be used without having to
> > wait until the first element is defined?
> > -->
> >
> > <Top xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> > xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="nameclash.xsd">
> >
> > <Ctx1>
> > <PrimaryKey>
> > <Part1>fred</Part1>
> > <Part2>fart</Part2>
> > </PrimaryKey>
> > </Ctx1>
> > <Ctx2>
> > <PrimaryKey><Part>fredfart</Part></PrimaryKey>
> > </Ctx2>
> >
> > </Top>
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > unmarshall output (as you'd expect teh second def for PrimaryKey overwrites
> the
> > first one).
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > com.lard.xml.castor.MarshallArtworkGen -v -f resources/example1.xml
> > org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDescriptor for 'Part1' in
> > ClassDescriptor of PrimaryKey
> >
> > org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDescriptor for 'Part1' in
> > ClassDescriptor of PrimaryKey{file: ; line: 17; column: 14}
> >
> > at
> >
org.exolab.castor.xml.UnmarshalHandler.startElement(UnmarshalHandler.java:815)
> >
> > at
org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser.startElement(SAXParser.java:1340)
> >
> > at
> >
>
org.apache.xerces.validators.common.XMLValidator.callStartElement(XMLValidator.java:1284)
>
> >
> > at
> >
>
org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLDocumentScanner$ContentDispatcher.dispatch(XMLDocumentScanner.java:1171)
>
> >
> > at
> >
>
org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLDocumentScanner.parseSome(XMLDocumentScanner.java:381)
>
> >
> > at org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:1098)
> >
> > at org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.unmarshal(Unmarshaller.java:338)
> >
> > at
> com.lard.xml.castor.MarshallArtworkGen.main(MarshallArtworkGen.java:43)
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > So as a result I've had to prefix all my elements with unique prefixes. Am I
> > missing something or doing something wrong?
> >
> > It seems that the fix you talk about in
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg05235.html
> > may need to be applied to classes for all elements, not just those resulting
> > from annoymous types?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Norval
> > ***************************************************************************
> > This message and any attachments is/are intended for the person/s to whom
> > it was addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information.
> > If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> > promptly and destroy the message without copying it or divulging its
> > contents to any person.
> >
> > ***************************************************************************
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-dev
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
