(See attached file: simple.tgz)
Hi Keith,
Here's all possible interesting data (unless I missed something).
Cheers
|--------+----------------------->
| | Keith Visco |
| | <kvisco@intal|
| | io.com> |
| | |
| | 22/02/2002 |
| | 09:16 AM |
| | Please |
| | respond to |
| | castor-dev |
| | |
|--------+----------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| cc: (bcc: Norval Hope/ISD/VWA) |
| Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Overriding |
| Generated Classes |
>--------------------------------------------------------|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info and update (unfortunately I'm behind a firewall at work so
> I'll won't be able to use the fix until I get home).
>
> Given your comments on specific difference between srcgen/mapping, I'm
expecting
> the problem I was having with differences in representation of collections
> (arrays versus lists/explained in previous post) will still exist. That one
> seemed to be a showstopper for me (at least at 11pm last night) so I opted for
> the "superclass thingo".
Hi Norval,
I went back through the thread and couldn't find the schema/test case
you are using for this. I see the one for demonstrating the duplicate
element names issue, but not the one for the collection issue. If you
can send me a small test case which demonstrates the collection issue, I
can take a look into it further and at least verify if it's a bug, or
something that the MappingTool just can't handle.
Thanks,
--Keith
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
simple.tgz
Description: Binary data
