Sean,

re-reading your reply, I wonder how your database schemas actually look like ? 

Regards
Werner

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 21:25:12 +0800, Sean Liang wrote:

>Werner,
>
>You must be correct. I thought that option model just has to know which question it 
>belongs to.
>
>Can you explain what happens after the question.setAnswer(B) is invoked? On the 
>option model sides, A, B and C are all the same, but why only A is 
removed, B can be got from both question.option and question.answer?
>
>What will you do in my situation? How can I mark the correct answer of a question?
>
>Thanks,
>Sean
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Werner Guttmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:28 PM
>Subject: Re: [castor-user] [JDO] A collection and an object refer to the same type
>
>
>> 
>> Sean,
>> 
>> I guess your problems are a direct consequence of not modelling the relations 
>> correctly. In your example, you have two relations, a 1:1 (question - 
>> answer) and a 1:M relation (question - options). As far as the entity 
>> model.Question is concerned, you are fine as you have defined both relations, 
>> indeed. 
>> 
>> But on the model side of things, you've defined only one member named 'question'. 
>> Is this the return leg of the question - answer or questions - 
options 
>> relation ?
>> 
>> I guess you see what I mean ...
>> 
>> Werner
>> 
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:25:15 +0800, Sean Liang wrote:
>> 
>> >Please take a look at the following snippet:
>> >
>> > <class identity="id" key-generator="HIGH-LOW" name="model.Question">
>> >        <map-to xml="question" table="question" />
>> >        <field name="id" type="integer">
>> >            <sql name="id" type="integer" />
>> >        </field>
>> >        <field name="subject" type="string">
>> >            <sql name="subject" type="varchar" />
>> >        </field>
>> >        <field name="option" type="model.Option" collection="collection">
>> >            <sql many-key="question" />
>> >        </field>
>> >        <field name="answer" type="model.Option">
>> >            <sql name="answer" />
>> >        </field>
>> >    </class>
>> >
>> >    <class identity="id" key-generator="HIGH-LOW" name="model.Option">
>> >        <map-to xml="questionoption" table="questionoption" />
>> >        <field name="id" type="integer">
>> >            <sql name="id" type="integer" />
>> >        </field>
>> >        <field name="question" type="model.Question">
>> >            <sql name="question" />
>> >        </field>
>> >        <field name="value" type="string">
>> >            <sql name="value" type="varchar" />
>> >        </field>
>> >    </class>
>> >
>> >As what you can see, a Question contains several possible options, one of which is 
>> >the correct answer. That is, option and answer in the Question 
>> refer to the same type "model.Option".
>> >
>> >Let's say we have a question with 3 options A, B, C.
>> >
>> >The first time I call question.setAnswer(A), it is totally fine. But the next time 
>> >I call question.setAnswer(B), guess what? Option A is removed from 
>> question.option collection and in the database A.question is set to null.
>> >
>> >I tried this stupid code:
>> >
>> >    Option a = question.getAnswer();
>> >    question.setAnswer(b);
>> >    a.setQuestion(question);
>> >
>> >but it still doesn't work. I don't have idea about how to solve this problem now.
>> >
>> >Could you provide me any suggestion for that? Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> >Sean
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------- 
>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
>>         unsubscribe castor-user
>> 



----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-user

Reply via email to