Werner,
Thanks, that's 1837. Apart from implementing getCallQuery, would there be 
anything else stopping me from using the jdo for this ?  The stored proc is 
creating a result with a different field name and *no* key field from the 
original table.

>
>�Charles,
>
>�I do not see a reason why it could not be added. Can you please
>�open an enhancement request at http://bugzilla.exolab.org, and
>�attach the information
>�provided in your email. It could be, though, that we'll need your
>�help with regards to testing et alias. But let's discuss the
>�details once the bug has been
>�created.
>
>�Regards
>�Werner
>

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-user

Reply via email to