Charles, I am afraid yes, as Castor requires a certain field order to be returned. Iirc, the fields have to be returned in exactly the order specified in your mapping file. And all fields/column will have to be part of the data returned.
Regards Werner On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:43:28 GMT, Charles Abell wrote: >Werner, >Thanks, that's 1837. Apart from implementing getCallQuery, would there be >anything else stopping me from using the jdo for this ? The stored proc is creating a result with a different field name and *no* key field from the original table. > >> >> Charles, >> >> I do not see a reason why it could not be added. Can you please >> open an enhancement request at http://bugzilla.exolab.org, and >> attach the information >> provided in your email. It could be, though, that we'll need your >> help with regards to testing et alias. But let's discuss the >> details once the bug has been >> created. >> >> Regards >> Werner >> > > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-user
