But if the mapping file refers only to the result of the Stored Proc ?

That is :
<!--  Mapping for maildest  -->
  <class name="quote.Maildest"  identity="oaddress ">
    <description>Mail Destinations</description>
    <map-to table="EMAIL" xml="email" />
      <cache-type type="none"/>
      <field name="oaddress " type="string" >
      <sql name="oaddress " type="char"/>
      <xml node="element"/>
    </field>
    </class>
</mapping>
>
>�Charles,
>
>�I am afraid yes, as Castor requires a certain field order to be
>�returned. Iirc, the fields have to be returned in exactly the order
>�specified in your mapping file.
>�And all fields/column will have to be part of the data returned.
>
>�Regards
>�Werner
>
>�On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:43:28 GMT, Charles Abell wrote:
>
>>�Werner,
>>�Thanks, that's 1837. Apart from implementing getCallQuery, would
>>�there be anything else stopping me from using the jdo for this ?
>>�The stored proc is
>�creating a result with a different field name and *no* key field
>�from the original table.
>
>>>
>>>�Charles,
>>>
>>>�I do not see a reason why it could not be added. Can you please
>>>�open an enhancement request at http://bugzilla.exolab.org, and
>>>�attach the information
>>>�provided in your email. It could be, though, that we'll need
>>>�your help with regards to testing et alias. But let's discuss
>>>�the details once the bug has been created.
>>>
>>>�Regards
>>>�Werner

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-user

Reply via email to