|
No doubt PFD’s might have helped in
the Eygptian ferry disaster – though most people were asleep when the
boat went over - but PFD’s are only a bandaide on what is inherently a
very unstable vessel design – there are lots of issues with that
particular ferry design – in fact there was another one that capsized in
the far east I think it was not long before the one in Egypt. In fact that
design has one of the worst overall safety records. MA has a
mandatory PFD requirement for children – but judging by the number of
kids I see in boats during the summer months without them – I suspect it
has as much enforceability as the seatbelt law does. Frankly, you can’t legislate common
sense and personal responsibility and from what I’ve seen it’s
seriously on the wane in this country. Just look at the latest study of
college kids that identified that 60% of them were functionally illiterate when
it came to common tasks – but I bet they all passed the MCAS or Regents
or whatever legislated test of supposed competence the more money than brains
group of legislator’s dreamed up - Darn it Phil mention more rules and regs
and you can get this old hippie anarchist going – Dave – feeling the Karma C27 #5212 Windabout http://dpbcc.home.comcast.net From: Does We have one related to children, which has
spawned PFD sharing programs at various family beach outing hot spots.
I’m sure it’s saved more than a few. It includes children on the
dock. I think in the wake of the Egyptian ferry
disaster you may do better in focusing the language of the law rather than
mount opposition. Maybe expand jet ski PFD requirements to power boats 22 feet and
under. And pick it up vessels traveling at more than 12 knots or with more than
12 aboard. That would let lawmakers be responsible
and leave open ground for responsible small boat skippers. Phil Agur
s/v Wing Tip Commodore, Call Sign WCW3485 IC27/270A
www.catalina27.org
Vessel Doc# 1039809 -----Original Message----- Fellow
Marylanders - There is
a bill going through the legislature right now REQUIRING everyone on a boat in There
is an article in the Capital today saying that the bill is going to be reworked
to include charter boats (fishing boats and water taxis etc.), but I don't
think we should just sit by and wait to see IF they change the law. The
article does not address anything other than charter boats. http://mlis.state.md.us/2006rs/billfile/hb0140.htm
I urge
those of you who value your choice to wear a PFD or not wear one to contact
your representatives and tell them what you think about having your freedom to
choose revoked. I hope someone steps in and tells me that I have my facts
wrong, but I have heard this from several sources, most recently at AYC on
Saturday.
Off my
soap box now. Chris D |
- catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Maryland Boatopia410
- RE: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Maryland Phil Agur
- RE: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Maryla... DaveBreski
- Re: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Maryla... ahoyther
- Re: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Maryla... Lawrence Pinto
- Re: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Ma... Tim Ford
- Re: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage i... boatopia410
- RE: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage in Ma... Phil Agur
- Re: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD usage i... Deborah Meyers
- RE: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD us... DaveBreski
- RE: catalina27-talk: Mandatory PFD us... Phil Agur

