On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > I maintain that the answer to that question is the same as before: > it is helpful to the users of the package.
How? Am I dense? I fail to see what "0/5" or "3/5" or "5/5" does. It's a piece of data, sure, but so is 17, 10045.223, and 4/7. But none of these provide any *information*. > In any case, the community had agreed to to allow rating but to > make commenting optional (at the package author's choice). I don't > see what has changed since. Who is this "community" you speak of, and when and where did "they" agree? I don't see a single person other than you stepping up to defend this ill-considered feature. Jacob _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
