On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:53 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > It's not the final word. If you can suggest a procedure that fairly > involves the end users also (which *frequently* had requested from > me that I provide this very feature), and they now say they don't > like this, I'd be willing to reconsider.
Well, there a a variety of ways that users of Django can provide feedback in a constructive way: they can file a ticket, ask for help on django-users, ask questions on Stack Overflow, propose features on django-dev, complain to the DSF, complain to me personally, ... So something simple would be to let package authors provide a "feedback" link. But once again: why is it your position to force package authors to do *anything* here? If I want to put some code up for Python users to use why do I have to follow some arbitrary rules imposed by fiat? I've said it over and over again: PyPI is a catalog. It's a list of Python packages. Anything more dilutes the purpose and turns it into something political. Jacob _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
