Sorry, I have no idea what this message is about. Some context/explanation please? What action are you asking for?
Note that Lea Wiemann is no longer active in the Docutils project. -- David Goodger On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:24, Yuval Greenfield <ubershme...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Michael Foord <fuzzy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 13 December 2011 10:29, Yuval Greenfield <ubershme...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Toshio Kuratomi is correct: >>> > Additionally, I'm not certain of the use case cited. Isn't the utility >>> > of >>> > a site like http://python3wos.appspot.com/ in seeing which popular or >>> > widely depended upon packages have no python3 version? With that in >>> > mind, >>> > the listing on that page wouldn't seem to depend on whether a package's >>> > author intends to port to python3. >>> >> >> unittest2 has a Python 3 port: unittest2py3k >> >> docutils is also Python 3 compatible (since version 0.6), even if they're >> not using the trove classifier. >> > > My initial response was to remove modules that had python 3 > equivalents on the wall. This makes sense for eg setuptools and jinja > as it wouldn't be accurate to give them a double green listing and > skew the percentage. > > Packages that have a single listing on the top 200 and have a python 3 > equivalent I should mark as green. I guess the best solution would be > to consolidate these packages. I'll work on it. > > Concerning docutils, I sent an email to Lea Wiemann > (lewiem...@gmail.com) and am cc-ing David Goodger for the trove > classifier though I don't think I can be held responsible for this > one. > > > Yuval Greenfield _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
