On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:36:29AM -0500, David Goodger wrote: > Sorry, I have no idea what this message is about. > Some context/explanation please? > What action are you asking for? > > Note that Lea Wiemann is no longer active in the Docutils project. > I think Yuval is asking that the pypi page for docutils be updated to have::
Programming Language :: Python :: 3 as well as:: Programming Language :: Python :: 2 I'm not sure if that's right, though -- I just checked the docutils page and it has :: Programming Language :: Python which seems to be a valid method of marking a module as belonging to multiple sub-categories. (This thread has some other ideas as well, but those don't directly impact docutils) -Toshio > -- David Goodger > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:24, Yuval Greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Michael Foord <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 13 December 2011 10:29, Yuval Greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Toshio Kuratomi is correct: > >>> > Additionally, I'm not certain of the use case cited. Isn't the utility > >>> > of > >>> > a site like http://python3wos.appspot.com/ in seeing which popular or > >>> > widely depended upon packages have no python3 version? With that in > >>> > mind, > >>> > the listing on that page wouldn't seem to depend on whether a package's > >>> > author intends to port to python3. > >>> > >> > >> unittest2 has a Python 3 port: unittest2py3k > >> > >> docutils is also Python 3 compatible (since version 0.6), even if they're > >> not using the trove classifier. > >> > > > > My initial response was to remove modules that had python 3 > > equivalents on the wall. This makes sense for eg setuptools and jinja > > as it wouldn't be accurate to give them a double green listing and > > skew the percentage. > > > > Packages that have a single listing on the top 200 and have a python 3 > > equivalent I should mark as green. I guess the best solution would be > > to consolidate these packages. I'll work on it. > > > > Concerning docutils, I sent an email to Lea Wiemann > > ([email protected]) and am cc-ing David Goodger for the trove > > classifier though I don't think I can be held responsible for this > > one. > > > > > > Yuval Greenfield > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
pgpidgNMvykrS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
