On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 03:53 +0200, Yuval Greenfield wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Chris McDonough <[email protected]> > wrote: > On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:29 +0200, Yuval Greenfield wrote: > > > 1. If this forum likes it I'll add a lock icon next to > packages with > > the "Programming Language :: Python :: 2 :: Only" classifier > with the > > following mouse-over: "The maintainers of this code have > declared it > > will run on Python 2 only for the foreseeable future". This > might > > lessen the social pressure on the maintainers to port. I > don't think > > it'll help the PR issue. > > > For the record, at least one package is already using the new > "2-only" > classifier now: > > http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Pylons/1.0.1rc1 > > > > > > > I added both features (python2only and py3equivalents). It took a lot > longer than I expected and cost $0.10 of GAE quotas... > > > Please do critique: > > > http://python3wos.appspot.com/
Thanks for adding the feature. The way you've decided to do it, I guess folks can't really opt out of the "shame of being red" by using a python 2 only tag. Also, given the composition of packages on there, that chart will be all-red more or less forever; there's unlikely to be many newly charting python 3-compat packages any time soon, at least none that overtake the "will always be red" ones which have been around for 8 + years. Lame. - C _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
