Nilson Santos Figueiredo Junior wrote:
> On 7/1/06, Marcus Ramberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, we've heard nothing from you guys about the development release. I guess
>> that means one of two things. Either we've made a bugfree catalyst version,
>> or you guys haven't tested it out. If that's the case, this is your last
>> chance. I'm about to leave YAPC NA, and fly back home to norway. When I get
>> back to work on monday morning, GMT+1 , _03 will become 5.70000, unless
>> we've heard anything to the contrary.
>
> Right, I'll try to test an Catalyst application I've got and report the
> results.
> It already bombed with the latest DBIx::Class, so I am now afraid that
> the newest Catalyst will make stop working too.
Yeah, but that was only because your code was using an undocumented untested
hack that I originally offered to you as such :)
Admittedly we're still going to fix it but I think we're allowed that one ...
--
Matt S Trout Offering custom development, consultancy and support
Technical Director contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
