On 11/16/06, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regardless of whether the test is 'real world', and regardless of whether the frameworks 'were meant to serve more complicated things', Catalyst is slower in this instance. All things being unequal, if I tell my boss we have 3 frameworks to choose from, and one is flexible, and the others are fast, he's going to choose fast every time...even knowing the testing may be faulty. Yes, I know better. He probably does too. But that's how the world works.
What world is this? The world that doesn't realise programmers are far more expensive than hardware? The world where bosses don't realise the cost of inflexibility? The ability not to adapt fast is a concern that's been hammered long and hard in business circles since forever so this nominal boss would have to be really particularly shortsighted to blindly choose speed over flexibility. Post a rebuttal, suggest better benchmarks, leave a trackback, move on. This doesn't seem like getting wound up about. Paul _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
