On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:39:38AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>       While I mostly agree with Matt's take on unix/linux issues -- I will
> give my support to Cent/RH here.  It is true,  they have had some missteps
> with perl in the past.  Those tend get resolved fairly quickly. The perl
> speed issue listed above is fixed in current patches.

Is it fuck.

It's now a 2* hit rather than a 30* hit but the brain-damage is still there,
at least according to Jon Schutz's last benchmark of a couple weeks back.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director                    http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/            http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/

_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to