* On Mon, May 05 2008, Daniel McBrearty wrote: > tht's reasonable. > > what is not so reasonable is suddenly deciding that you are going to > *croak* on something which you didn't even test for with previous > releases. > > A warning would have been fine, at least for half a year or so.
In that case we would be having this exact discussion 6 months from now. Breaking broken code is always good. +1 for HTTP::Message. If you don't want new versions of modules, then *don't upgrade them*. Regards, Jonathan Rockway -- print just => another => perl => hacker => if $,=$" _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
