mod_cgid and mod_fastcgi just have FastCGI protocol in common.
No, and I think it's not planned, because mod_fcgid has an
adaptive-spawning design and does not support
"static servers or external servers".
-Thiago Rondon
Octavian Rasnita escreveu:
Hi,
I understand that comparing it with mod_perl, fast CGI has the
advantage of allowing us to restart the applications without
restarting the server.
But I have also understood that fcgid don't allow using the app as an
external server.
If this is true, than which is the advantage of fcgid?
I ask this, because it seems that it works better than fastcgi, it is
maintained and prefered, but I can't see why.
Thank you.
Octavian
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
