On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 03:00:48PM +0300, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that comparing it with mod_perl, fast CGI has the advantage of
> allowing us to restart the applications without restarting the server.
> But I have also understood that fcgid don't allow using the app as an
> external server.
>
> If this is true, than which is the advantage of fcgid?
fcgid is designed for shared hosting. it's basically useless for dedicated
setups.
> I ask this, because it seems that it works better than fastcgi, it is
> maintained and prefered, but I can't see why.
mod_fastcgi is maintained, just minimally and quietly, and it works
perfectly.
For dedicated setups it's the only option; I dunno who you think prefers
fcgid but I'm certainly not one of them.
--
Matt S Trout Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
Technical Director http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/ http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
