I will take a look. Thanks for the merge. I'll report to the list when I've verified.
On 11/30/09, Tomas Doran <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 Nov 2009, at 22:03, Brian Phillips wrote: >> I don't recall any remaining changes that have been suggested that >> weren't implemented. t0m, I'm guessing that branch is pretty stale by >> now. Can we rebase or merge the current mainline to make sure it >> still works with the current state of Catalyst? > > I've merged current Catalyst trunk to the branch for you just now. > > It was a clean merge, but I haven't run the tests or anything, so > ymmv :) > >> Do you have any >> further suggestions on the branch in its current form? > > I've given myself a TODO note to look at the code again now that it is > up to date. > > If you could also have a look over the branch and check you're happy > and it still works then that'd be good. > >> Should I just >> submit it to the mailing list as you originally suggested? > > Yeah, do something to avoid it getting forgotten again - yell on the > lists, or poke people on irc or whatever :) > > Cheers > t0m > > _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
