On 21 April 2010 18:01, J. Shirley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> __END__
> Benchmark: running all, low, sep for at least 1 CPU seconds...
> all: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.11 usr + 0.00 sys = 1.11 CPU) @
> 2917341.44/s (n=3238249)
> low: 0 wallclock secs ( 1.27 usr + 0.04 sys = 1.31 CPU) @
> 12930179.39/s (n=16938535)
> sep: 1 wallclock secs ( 1.21 usr + 0.01 sys = 1.22 CPU) @
> 3223081.15/s (n=3932159)
>
> Subroutines suck, lets all use hashrefs.
Now that it's quietened down, I can ask a question. Does this I mean
it's preferable to use
$c->req->{parameters}->{foo}
rather than
$c->req->param('foo')
Obviously I'd rather use the faster method but if I'm breaking the
encapsulation in some ways that's going to bite me later, I'd steer
clear.
Dp.
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
