From: "Aristotle Pagaltzis" <pagalt...@gmx.de> >* Octavian Rasnita <orasn...@gmail.com> [2012-01-14 17:40]: >> Should it be used diffrently with Catalyst 5.9 > > For 5.9 I suggest switching horses completely and using the built-in > PSGI support together with Starman as a stand-alone preforking dæmon. >
I know that it is the recommended way, but actually I wanted to find why Ubuntu Apache is continuously consuming more memory for an older app although CatalystX::LeakChecker doesn't report any leakage, so I started to compare with other servers. > Works beautifully for me. > And I just tested with Starman and it is great! It consumes ~ 7 times less memory and it works faster. > You get to use PSGI middlewares for many of the things you would’ve used > Cat plugins for before, which are both simpler and more flexible. > I will need to study this part better. Octavian _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
