Typically the deadline is the day that the article is due. Commits go into http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/Catalyst/trunk/examples/CatalystAdvent (into the dir root/2012/pen)
Couldn't get momentum for the monthly this year, but I do have a couple of things that could be used for the advent that never got the required polish. On 22/11/2012, at 4:17 AM, Duncan Garland wrote: > What was the decision? Is this going ahead? > > How do you submit articles? When is the deadline? > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Napiorkowski [mailto:jjn1...@yahoo.com] > Sent: 16 November 2012 16:39 > To: The elegant MVC web framework > Subject: [Catalyst] Its time for Advent again > > Hey everyone, > > Here's a copy of a blog post I did announcing calls for advent articles: > > ===== > > So last year wasn't the most spectacular Perl Catalyst Advent we've ever had. > Lets see if we can do better this go around! In order to assist, here's a > few thoughts on simple articles you can do: > * Take any old article and modernize it... > * ...or show an alternative approach. > * Elaborate or improve on an idea you've previously written about in a > blog, or that you read about in some else's blog. > * Cools things you can do now that Catalyst is Plack at the core. > * Alternatives to using the stash to pass data around. > * Examples of applications not using Template Toolkit or DBIx::Class > * Examples of using Catalyst with other frameworks such as Web-Simple and > Web-Machine > * Examples of testing, especially anything using Behavior Driven > techniques (think rspec or cucumber). > Alternatively we don't need tech oriented articles. I'd be really happy to > see some people write something from a business or planning perspective. For > example, if you are a CTO or person in planning, something about how you used > Catalyst effectively to rapidly meet business goals would be very helpful. > Or if someone wanted to look at the results of the recent poll and perform > some interesting analysis, I think the community would love to see that. > Lets get it rolling! > > ===== > > What I didn't announce via the blog is that if we don't get enough > commitment, it would be better to not do a catalyst only advent article, and > just combine our submissions over the one of the general Perl Advent > calendars. > > Having a poor showing in our advent calendar doesn't send the right message > and it would be better to have a one or two in a popular and full calendar > than a bunch of empty dates on ours. > > Lets here your thoughts on the matter! > > John > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
