LAW OF THE LAND
WorldNetDaily
'Creative lawyering' reopens priest molestation case
<http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=87540>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=87540
 

Cardinal Mahony 'mystified' over probe into retired, dead clergy

Posted: January 31, 2009
12:00 am Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Emacs!

Los Angeles Archdiocese Cardinal Roger M. Mahony

A U.S attorney in California has launched a 
controversial federal probe into the Los Angeles 
Roman Catholic Archdiocese's handling of priest 
molestation charges, an investigation that some 
call "creative" and "innovative," while others 
have labeled it "strange" and "mystifying."

After years of investigation into the Catholic 
Church's mishandling of molestation complaints, 
the archdiocese agreed two years ago to pay $660 
million to 508 people who accused priests of sexual abuse.

But U.S. Attorney Thomas P. O'Brien has now 
launched a new, federal grand jury investigation, 
seeking to prosecute the church on fraud charges 
related to the clergy abuse scandal.

Los Angeles Archdiocese Cardinal Roger M. Mahony 
told KNX radio that he is "mystified" and 
"puzzled" that the church would be under scrutiny again.

"We have been through these investigations for 
years now: our own internal investigations, 
outside audited investigations, district 
attorney, law enforcement, etc.," Mahony said. 
"We've admitted everything. In all the years 
since, we've reached a settlement with the 
plaintiffs, and that's all behind us."

Mahony also told KNX that of the 22 priests who 
have been named by the grand jury, two are dead 
and the remaining 20 have retired from the priesthood.

"I thought all the questions were already looked 
into and resolved, years back now," Mahony said.

According to Los Angeles Times sources, O'Brien 
is targeting the church under a federal statute 
that makes it illegal to "scheme … to deprive 
another of the intangible right of honest 
services," a law typically applied to public 
officials and not known to have ever been used against church leaders.

San Diego lawyer Charles LaBella, a former U.S. 
attorney himself, told the Times he was surprised 
at O'Brien's application of the law.

"That's a strange one. I have never heard of it 
being used in that kind of situation," LaBella 
said. "Usually, it's used against public 
officials who owe a duty of honest services to the taxpayers."

Sources told the Times that in this case O'Brien 
is considering applying the law to the church, as 
parishioners should have the right to expect 
church leadership to provide the "honest 
services" of keeping children safe from predatory priests.

Laurie Levenson, a Loyola Law School professor 
and former federal prosecutor, told the Times 
that O'Brien's biggest challenge may be 
persuading jurors that he's not just stretching 
the law to apply somewhere it wasn't meant to govern.

"I'd put it in the category of creative 
lawyering," Levenson said. "It doesn't mean it's 
bad. But it will be challenging to not only get 
charges on these grounds but, if they get charges, to win a conviction."

O'Brien, it seems, has a reputation for "creative lawyering."

Last year, O'Brien spearheaded the case against 
Lori Drew, a Missouri mother who sent fictitious 
messages via MySpace to her daughter's teenage 
peer, prompting the neighbor girl – it was accused – to hang herself.

O'Brien dubbed the prosecution as the nation's 
first cyberbullying trial, but a U.S. district 
judge declared the conspiracy case a mistrial, 
the jury instead finding Drew guilty of only 
misdemeanor offenses for accessing computers without authorization.

O'Brien's office also attempted to prosecute 
ex-Marine Jose Luis Nazario for the killings of 
four unarmed Iraqi prisoners in Fallouja. Since 
Nazario had left the Marines and was no longer 
subject to a court-martial, O'Brian charged 
Nazario in civilian court under a law intended to 
prosecute soldiers' spouses or civilian Defense 
employees living in foreign countries. Nazario was acquitted.

Rebecca Lonergan, a former federal prosecutor who 
worked under O'Brien in the U.S. attorney's 
office, told the Times that O'Brien's methods can be unorthodox.

"The question is whether they've been overly 
aggressive or genuine attempts to make sure that 
crimes that should get prosecuted do get 
prosecuted," Lonergan said. "There are two 
possible motives. One is to do the right thing. 
The other is less meritorious, which is attention grabbing."

Of the new charges being considered against the 
Catholic Church, Lonergan confessed she couldn't 
say which of the two possible motives was driving O'Brien's investigation.

David Clohessy, national director of the 
Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests, 
told the Times he supports the investigation as a 
means of bringing not only the Catholic Church, 
but also now the church's leadership – like Mahony – to justice.

"It is long, long overdue," Clohessy said. "It is 
just crucial that the hierarchy face criminal 
charges, because almost every other conceivable 
means have been tried to bring reform."

Though the Times' sources say O'Brien is directly 
involved in the new clergy abuse case, O'Brien 
himself refused to discuss or even confirm the existence of the investigation.

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for O'Brien, however, 
did defend the U.S. attorney's record.

"Everything we do is in the pursuit of justice," 
Mrozek told the Times. "We have used innovative 
legal theories in an effort to vindicate the 
victims of criminal activity. While this may have 
generated criticism in some circles, we stand by our decisions."

The Times itself issued an editorial applauding 
O'Brien for seeking justice but questioning the 
approach of using a law against elected officials 
using their office to defraud voters for personal 
gain in order to allege that the church 
fraudulently denied its members a rightfully expected service.

"Here too we worry about the elasticity of the 
law," the editorial reads. "If Mahony conspired 
to protect abusive priests, charge him with 
conspiracy. If he blocked inquiries, charge him 
with obstruction. But his crimes, if any, are 
easily defined under tested laws, not as vague denials of service."


<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic 
on Amazon <*}}}>< <*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<attachment: e8b628.jpg>>

Reply via email to