CON(VENT) ARTIST
http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/02192009/news/regionalnews/con_vent__artist_155931.htm
 

By DAREH GREGORIAN

February 19, 2009 --

An upstate art appraiser better watch his knuckles - a convent says 
he conned its nuns out of $1.7 million.

The Daughters of Mary Mother of Our Savior say appraiser Mark Lasalle 
intentionally defrauded them by convincing them a painting they had 
was worth $450,000, and then promptly reselling it with a 
co-conspirator for $2 million.

Lasalle and art dealer Mark Zaplin "intentionally, deliberately, 
wantonly, maliciously [and] with evil motive . . . perpetrated fraud 
against the Daughters of Mary Mother of Our Savior," the nuns charge 
in court papers.

The suspected scam was revealed to the sisters by another alleged 
co-conspirator who turned whistleblower.

"Mr. Lasalle said we could 'screw' the sisters and make a handsome 
profit," art dealer Paul Dumont said in an affidavit filed on the 
nuns' behalf.

Now the convent is looking for much more than Hail Marys from Lasalle 
and Zaplin - it's suing for $51 million, charging fraud and unjust enrichment.

"They'd trusted [Lasalle] completely," said the sisters' lawyer, 
Bruce Goldstone.

Lasalle's lawyer, Dan Sleasman, said the allegations are "false" and 
the lawsuit is "filled with one falsehood after another." Zaplin 
referred comment to his lawyer, who didn't immediately return a call.

The order was given the painting by a parishioner in 2002, and hung 
the work in its chapel on Hearts Content Road in Round Top, which is 
outside of Albany.

One of the nuns thought the deteriorating painting might be valuable, 
and it turned out it was - it was Notre Dame Ange, an 1889 painting 
by William-Adolphe Bouguereau.

The convent turned to Lasalle, "who held himself out as an expert 
appraiser of art with more than 20 years of experience," to assess 
the painting for them, the suit says.

He told them the work was worth between $150,000 and $250,000, and 
could be worth even more if it was restored, the suit claims. Dumont, 
meanwhile, said Lasalle told him it was actually worth "between 
$700,000 and $800,000."

The nuns, at Lasalle's urging and "at substantial cost to themselves, 
contracted to have the painting restored" in late 2004, the suit 
says, which is when Lasalle allegedly hatched his plan.

He had Dumont line up Zaplin as a "straw buyer," the filings say. 
When the restoration was completed in February 2006, Lasalle 
allegedly told the sisters it now had "a fair-market value of 
$350,000 to $450,000," and he had a "good-faith buyer" ready to take 
it off their hands: Zaplin.

When the nuns balked at Zaplin's initial offer of $350,000, Lasalle 
talked them out of putting the painting up for auction, and had 
Zaplin cut a check for $450,000, the suit says.

Lasalle encouraged the nuns to take the deal, the suit says, which 
they did. It wasn't until much later that Dumont came forward and 
told them Lasalle and Zaplin had flipped the painting for more than 
$2 million. It has since sold for more than $5 million.

<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]


  <*}}}>< <http://www.halfthekingdom.org/on+allposters+today.html>on 
AllPosters today <*}}}><<*}}}>< 
<http://astore.amazon.com/halthekin-20>Catholic on Amazon <*}}}><
+
<*}}}>< <http://www.holypostage.com/>Holy Postage <*}}}><
<*}}}><<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Half the 
<http://www.halfthekingdom.org/>Kingdom!<*}}}><

+ "The fruit of abortion is nuclear war" - Bl. Mother Teresa +

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Please note that I do not send or open attachments sent to this list. 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Catholics on Fire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Catholics-on-Fire

May the blessing of Jesus and our Blessed Mother be with you
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to