On 12 November 2012 13:52, Paul Smith <p...@mad-scientist.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 13:11 -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> #!/bin/sh which is mandated to exist by POSIX > > Actually, unless there's been a change, POSIX doesn't mandate that the > POSIX shell appear as /bin/sh.
Okay. Taking a deeper look here, I'm wrong. That said, #!/bin/sh is certainly still more portable than #!/bin/bash and the latter is still a portability bug. > Unfortunately, this means that systems are free to provide definitively > non-POSIX /bin/sh and still be allowed to paint themselves with the > veneer of compliance (yes I'm looking at you Solaris!!), since there is > a POSIX shell somewhere (else) on the system. Yes, this can happen. :( -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache