Michael, My experience was quite clear cut, I basically consulted the proctor with every possibly doubt I had, which was a few. His general respsonse to most of my concerns was straight to the point* 'if its not mentioned in the question, then Im not going to check it!'*.
My advice is as this is security exam be as specific as possible, within the confines of the task. Follow every task to the letter, if you have some output of what the result should look like, make sure it matches exactly. As long as your answers work fully and do not breach the restrictions that may be in the task you should be fine. As you have probably heard a thousand times, if in doubt ask the proctor! : ) Stu On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Davis <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Everyone – I have a question about the lab. Obviously time is an > issue so we need to do things with minimal commands as possible. When > creating ACL’s on our devices during the test, if for example we need to > allow ospf to come in to our router and the question does not mention to be > specific in our acl, is it sufficient to just put a statement for “permit > ospf any any” or do we assume that we need to be as specific as possible at > all times? > > How are we graded in this way? Obviously “ permit ospf any any” is quicker > and easier but will it cost points during grading? > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Stuart Hare CCIE #25616 (Security), CCSP, Microsoft MCP Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
