Do the proctors get upset if you bug them to often?

From: Stuart Hare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:40 PM
To: Michael Davis
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] ACL specifics for the lab exam

Michael,

My experience was quite clear cut, I basically consulted the proctor with every 
possibly doubt I had, which was a few.
His general respsonse to most of my concerns was straight to the point 'if its 
not mentioned in the question, then Im not going to check it!'.

My advice is as this is security exam be as specific as possible, within the 
confines of the task.
Follow every task to the letter, if you have some output of what the result 
should look like, make sure it matches exactly.
As long as your answers work fully and do not breach the restrictions that may 
be in the task you should be fine.
As you have probably heard a thousand times, if in doubt ask the proctor!  : )

Stu


On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Davis 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Everyone - I have a question about the lab.  Obviously time is an issue so 
we need to do things with minimal commands as possible.  When creating ACL's on 
our devices during the test, if for example we need to allow ospf to come in to 
our router and the question does not mention to be specific in our acl, is it 
sufficient to just put a statement for "permit ospf any any" or do we assume 
that we need to be as specific as possible at all times?
How are we graded in this way?  Obviously " permit ospf any any" is quicker and 
easier but will it cost points during grading?

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com/>



--
Regards,

Stuart Hare
CCIE #25616 (Security), CCSP, Microsoft MCP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to