Ultimately that depends on the proctor, I passed on my second attempt, the
first attempt the proctor, was difficult and quite miserable, on my second i
had a different proctor who was great, very friendly.

The way I see it you have paid a lot of money and took a lot of effort to be
there and they are there to support you. They should not be bothered at all
by you aksing questions, thats their job. I was reluctant to ask the proctor
in my first attempt, and only seen him when i really needed to. The second I
spoke to him loads, and felt more comfortable with my answers.

Honestly dont worry about how they feel, your concentration needs to be at
its maximum to pass ; )
Stu
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Michael Davis
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Do the proctors get upset if you bug them to often?
>
>
>
> *From:* Stuart Hare [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:40 PM
> *To:* Michael Davis
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Security] ACL specifics for the lab exam
>
>
>
> Michael,
>
>
>
> My experience was quite clear cut, I basically consulted the proctor with
> every possibly doubt I had, which was a few.
>
> His general respsonse to most of my concerns was straight to the point*'if 
> its not mentioned in the question, then Im not going to check it!'
> *.
>
>
>
> My advice is as this is security exam be as specific as possible, within
> the confines of the task.
>
> Follow every task to the letter, if you have some output of what the result
> should look like, make sure it matches exactly.
> As long as your answers work fully and do not breach the restrictions that
> may be in the task you should be fine.
>
> As you have probably heard a thousand times, if in doubt ask the proctor!
> : )
>
>
>
> Stu
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Michael Davis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone – I have a question about the lab.  Obviously time is an issue
> so we need to do things with minimal commands as possible.  When creating
> ACL’s on our devices during the test, if for example we need to allow ospf
> to come in to our router and the question does not mention to be specific in
> our acl, is it sufficient to just put a statement for “permit ospf any any”
> or do we assume that we need to be as specific as possible at all times?
>
> How are we graded in this way?  Obviously “ permit ospf any any” is quicker
> and easier but will it cost points during grading?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Stuart Hare
> CCIE #25616 (Security), CCSP, Microsoft MCP
> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
>



-- 
Regards,

Stuart Hare
CCIE #25616 (Security), CCSP, Microsoft MCP
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to