It depends on the question... if its explicitly mentioend to use the NEW way,, or NOT to use the OLD day... then you would need to use the SOURCE key word.
R2(config-if)#ip verify unicast ? notification drop-rate notify reverse-path Reverse path validation of source address (old command format) source Validation of source address R2(config-if)#ip verify unicast FNK On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Piotr Matusiak <[email protected]> wrote: > You should use new command structure. > > Regards, > Piotr > > > 2011/10/9 Adil Pasha <[email protected]> > >> Guys, >> >> Is it a correct answer if I use "ip verify unicast reverse-path" instead >> of " ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx" ??? >> >> I did some search and found out on Cisco's website that the second command >> is replacing the legacy "reverse-path". >> >> Please shed some light on it. >> >> >> Best Regards. >> ______________________ >> Adil >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com <http://www.platinumplacement.com/> >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
