Thanks.

Best Regards.
______________________
Adil 

On Oct 9, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Fawad Khan wrote:

> It depends on the question... if its explicitly mentioend to use the NEW 
> way,, or NOT to use the OLD day... then you would need to use the SOURCE key 
> word.
>  
>  
> R2(config-if)#ip verify unicast ?
>   notification  drop-rate notify
>   reverse-path  Reverse path validation of source address (old command format)
>   source        Validation of source address
> R2(config-if)#ip verify unicast 
> FNK
> 
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Piotr Matusiak <[email protected]> wrote:
> You should use new command structure.
> 
> Regards,
> Piotr
> 
> 
> 2011/10/9 Adil Pasha <[email protected]>
> Guys,
> 
> Is it a correct answer if I use "ip verify unicast reverse-path" instead of " 
> ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx"   ???
> 
> I did some search and found out on Cisco's website that the second command is 
> replacing the legacy "reverse-path".
> 
> Please shed some light on it.
> 
> 
> Best Regards.
> ______________________
> Adil 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> 

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to