"ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx" gives you further options, such as adding an ACL with specified deny or permit and log for packets that fail or pass the uRPF check.
I would always opt for using this syntax, instead of the older one that its replacing. Mark On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Adil Pasha <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > > Is it a correct answer if I use "ip verify unicast reverse-path" instead of > " ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx" ??? > > I did some search and found out on Cisco's website that the second command > is replacing the legacy "reverse-path". > > Please shed some light on it. > > > Best Regards. > ______________________ > Adil > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
