I think ICT is being used figuratively here (e.g. a trunk between disparate systems), not literally.
Greg Jost Network Consulting Engineer Unified Communications Practice Cisco Systems, Inc. 214-274-1922 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 9:03 AM To: Jacob Owen Cc: CCIE Voice Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Non-GK ICT from CCM to CCME? No, I am looking at the solution thingy, and it shows a non-GK controlled ICT trunk... bizarre... I thought this was exclusively for connecting to another CCM cluster... in fact, the SRND says so... Never tried hooking it up to an IPIPGW... Jonathan On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan, > The 172.x.10y.1 addresses are the loopbacks for the > devices: > > 172.x.100.1 - HQ Router (x is pod number) > 172.x.101.1 - BR1 Router > 172.x.102.1 - BR2 Router > > I think it's probably an ICT trunk to an H323 > Gatekeeper but I don't have the book handy. > > > > --- Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does this work? Looking at solution for 4.9 in the > > workbook, and it > > shows a regular ICT but the IP address, 172.1.100.1 > > doesn't match up > > to anything... I am curious what it is... > > > > BR2's loopback should be 172.X.102.1 not 100.1... > > typo or am I lost? > > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > Jacob Owen > CCIE #14063 (R&S, Service Provider), CCVP, CCDP > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ____________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ >
